Add Row 
Add 
The Future of Cycling Advocacy in San Francisco
As the city dives deep into discussions about its transportation framework, an unsettling shift has emerged. The San Francisco Commission Streamlining Task Force is proposing the elimination of the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC), a volunteer group that has served as a beacon of advocacy for cyclists since its establishment in 1990. This recommendation has raised eyebrows and sparked an impassioned response from community leaders who view the BAC as a pivotal voice in ensuring bike safety and accessibility within the intricate landscape of San Francisco's streets.
Why Does This Matter?
Brandon Powell, Chair of the BAC, described the elimination proposal as "reckless," emphasizing that the committee is the only governmental voice advocating for cyclists' needs in the city. He argues that without this representation, efforts to enhance bicycle safety may stall, leading to dire consequences for both cyclists and pedestrians. An important point raised in the discussion is how the Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA) has taken over many operational roles that were once part of the BAC's responsibilities. Advocates argue that while the MTA is delivering tangible results, the necessity of a dedicated committee to represent cyclists cannot be understated.
Changing Landscape of Transportation Planning
It's crucial to recognize the evolution in how San Francisco approaches transportation. In the 1990s, the BAC had a crucial role due to the lack of dedicated departments for bicycle infrastructure. However, with the MTA now in charge, awe-inspiring advancements in multimodal planning are being made. Yet, the heart of the matter remains: community voices must find a route to express their concerns about cycling safety in this revised framework.
The Threat of Politicization
Aside from the BAC's potential elimination, the proposed changes to the governance of the SFMTA are alarming. The Task Force's recommendation to grant the mayor more influence over the SFMTA board by allowing him to fire directors raises concerns among advocates. Dylan Fabris from the San Francisco Transit Riders feels that this move could lead to politicizing an agency that was initially insulated from political influences, thus hindering its capacity to efficiently manage San Francisco’s transport system. Advocates fear that this new level of control could detract from the focused approach needed to manage safe transit effectively.
Community Voices Respond
The San Francisco Bicycle Coalition staunchly opposes the proposed elimination of the BAC. Claire Amable, the Coalition's Director of Advocacy, stated that the BAC has been vital for ensuring that the voices of everyday cyclists resonate within city governance. On the other hand, some believe that the MTA has matured enough to effectively manage cycling infrastructure without a dedicated committee. This contrasting perspective asks whether community involvement can indeed be effectively funneled through existing city agencies.
A Call for Engagement
As discussions intensify and hearings are scheduled by the Board of Supervisors for April, community members are encouraged to engage with policymakers. The upcoming hearings will serve as a critical junction to express the importance of the BAC and how essential it is to keep cycling voices alive in city planning. Cycling isn't just a means of transport; it symbolizes a lifestyle, a spirit of freedom, and a commitment to communal wellbeing.
The city finds itself at a crossroads, balancing advocacy with progressive transportation policies. As citizens of the Bay Area, it is vital to maintain robust discussions that shape the city's future. So, whether you bike, walk, or take transit, now's the time to speak up. Make your voice heard, engage in public discussions, and ensure that the city remains a safe and accessible place for everyone.
Write A Comment